From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 11 00:02:07 2011
From: Parker Coates <parker.coates () gmail ! com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:02:07 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch
Message-Id: <CAEn-ceYGuAt8KEMzhQZyL-fXBoiug1Euxc+6E2+i-CnxZ3-5ZQ () mail ! gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131832709405545

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that the new
> implementation is as secure as the existing one and that I did not forget an
> important case which would compromise the security.
>
> The general concept of the new screenlocker is described in the wiki:
> http://community.kde.org/KWin/Screenlocker
>
>> Screensavers without Locking
>> No valid use case: should no longer be supported.

Could you elaborate on this part? What is meant by "screensavers
without locking"?

Thanks,

Parker