[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: git workflow draft
From: Stephen Kelly <steveire () gmail ! com>
Date: 2011-08-26 10:06:26
Message-ID: j37r72$33k$2 () dough ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> >
>> > No branches should be prefixed with "KDE"; we consider that a reserved
>> > name.
>> > Nor topic should branches be numeric in nature (such as a version
>> > number) as
>> > those are reserved for actual release branches. (Sys admin at the
>> > meeting indicated that it is likely they will eventually put a push
>> > hook in place that
>> > prevents such "incorrectly" named branches.)
>>
>> Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from
>> sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating
>> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y
>> branches to KDE/X.Y I think concensus and consistency are important
>> here. Was there a decision that the official branches should be named
>> X.Y?
>
> My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means.
When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still use
branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with another
scheme then?
Thanks,
Steve.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic