On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Alex Fiestas <afiestas@kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
>> There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
>> LightDM, so why don't they instead improve KDM?  Why should they be
>> putting their effort into an immature project instead of a mature one?
> Because they're motivated to work on LightDM and not in KDM, new is always
> attractive.
>
> Personally I won't have time to work on LightDM though if I had to work on a
> DM I will probably choose LightDM, it is a feel not sure why.

So in other words when LightDM is mature no one will work on it and we
will be left with the same problem?

-Todd