On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
> There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
> LightDM, so why don't they instead improve KDM?  Why should they be
> putting their effort into an immature project instead of a mature one?
Because they're motivated to work on LightDM and not in KDM, new is always 
attractive.

Personally I won't have time to work on LightDM though if I had to work on a 
DM I will probably choose LightDM, it is a feel not sure why.