On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 AM, todd rme <toddrme2178@gmail.com> wrote:
> I gather from the discussion that most, if not all, the features that
> KDM still needs are also lacking in LightDM, while KDM has lots of
> features LightDM does not.  So if we are talking about wasted
> resources,

>wouldn't it waste far fewer resources

Ex.act.ly. That's precisely what I've been trying to get across this
entire time. But instead of adding anything missing to KDM, it's
instead added to a different, far less developed project.

> to add those new
> features and add the Gnome-centric bits in KDM than to add the new
> features, old features, gnome-centric bits, and KDE-centric bits in
> LightDM?


-- 
Shaun Reich,
KDE Software Developer (kde.org)