From kde-core-devel  Tue Apr 26 14:34:40 2011
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:34:40 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
Message-Id: <201104261534.40078.aacid () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=130382838031120

A Dimarts, 26 d'abril de 2011, Olivier Goffart va escriure: 
> > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> 
> I have not seen the details about KUndo2 yet,  but what are the reasons
> that keep you from improving QUndo in Qt?  Is there technical reasons? or
> just political issues?

In http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-14442 ossi implies it's an API 
problem and thus as the API can not be changed in QUndo it implies it needs 
new classes. Of course one could introduce QUndo2 classes but you seldom do 
that and of course there is the issue of the extreme overhead needed to get 
something into Qt vs getting it in kdelibs.

Albert