From kde-core-devel  Tue Apr 26 07:03:22 2011
From: "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:03:22 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
Message-Id: <1436712.Up46vT2Xuv () freedom>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=130380146325436
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart15723351.FuWsPlKTLQ"


--nextPart15723351.FuWsPlKTLQ
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?

we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt and 
kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.

please work on having this fixed in Qt itself, which is the correct/best place 
for this effort. it would be good to have this improved, and it's great that 
you're willing to work on it :)

in the code you've written, i see in the #includes KLocale as well as some 
"kis_" files. i didn't see any actual use of KLocale, however? is there any 
actual use of kdelibs in your work (hopefully not, as that would make a Qt 
target easier), are there any binary incompatible changes (again, hopefully 
not... :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks

--nextPart15723351.FuWsPlKTLQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk22bjoACgkQ1rcusafx20MDLwCdF9aycmGLPdkq9+6hDq4izeW9
h+cAmQGQvHXDk0pse6/28zmlpnf/533I
=uTQW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart15723351.FuWsPlKTLQ--