[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-11-10 21:42:53
Message-ID: 201011102242.53885 () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, ās 17:13:20, David Faure 
escreveu:
> > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a
> > GUI - e.g. you wouldn't be able to run any kuniqueapplication
> > twice (once on each display), since the bus would tell it "you're
> > already running".
> 
> Think about it: some of the kuniqueapplications must be relying on
> their uniqueness to access resources that mustn't be shared. Not all
> of them will have additional locks like kmail does.

Well, then those "unique" applications need to be fixed. $HOME on 
network shares is a reality and, judging from complaints on the KDE PIM 
mailing lists, people do start a KDE session on a second computer 
without first logging out of a KDE session running on another computer.


Regards,
Ingo

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]