[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Keeping binary compatibility
From: "David Jarvie" <djarvie () kde ! org>
Date: 2010-10-04 11:02:45
Message-ID: 6f164013603c5458bedad83bca6d3afe.squirrel () www ! sensical ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, October 1, 2010 2:32 pm, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Therefore I propose the following:
> - private libraries do not (obviously ...?) install their .h files and do
> use
> NAMELINK_SKIP option in install (see e.g.
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/khotkeys/libkhotkeysprivate/CMakeLists.txt?r1=862343&r2=895764)
Could you please explain why using NAMELINK_SKIP is better for private
libraries? What difference does it make whether links to the shared
library file are created?
--
David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author - http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic