[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: dependencies on KJS/KHTML in kdelibs and kdebase-runtime
From:       todd rme <toddrme2178 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-09-25 5:50:26
Message-ID: AANLkTimSjx385t7CagxbCrwTdcEmi3E1QBSR+cftg+pG () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Maksim Orlovich <mo85@cornell.edu> wrote:
>> Could you explain a bit more what we would lose by the move, i.e. what does
>> KJS provide that QtScript does not?  Do we lose any localization or
>> integration functionality by such a move?
>
> KJS is considerably smaller (~1mb instead of ~2.7mb) and more portable.

Is there any chance anyone will put KJS on a system but not put
QtScript?  If not, then wouldn't it be 3.7 mb vs. 2.7 mb, since
QtScript would be present in both cases?

And what do you mean my "more portable"?

-Todd

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]