From kde-core-devel  Wed Sep 22 00:53:52 2010
From: Matt Rogers <mattr () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:53:52 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: RFC: Moving Okteta from kdeutils to kdesdk
Message-Id: <AANLkTikREX7gzmfr2DDBXu1ifYknz8giA=qw_ZcsBL8M () mail ! gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=128511686918321

On Sep 21, 2010 6:36 PM, "Tom Albers" <toma@kde.org> wrote:>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>> <kossebau@kde.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > (cc:ed for emphasize Matt as coordinator of kdesk and Alexander as
>> > author of
>> > Structures tool for Okteta, myself is coordinator of kdeutils, guess
>> > Matt and
>> > Alexander are subscribed to kde-core-devel, so please drop them on
>> > reply)
>> >
>> > given that Okteta, the hex editor from kdeutils, has turned more and
>> > more into
>> > a developer oriented program, I think it fits even better into the
>> > kdesdk
>> > module. Thus I, being maintainer/author, would like to move it from
>> > kdeutils
>> > to kdesdk as soon as possible. The coordinator of kdeutils also
>> > thinks that
>> > would be a good thing ;)
>> >
>> > Do you agree this move is useful? If it is, should it be done before
>> > or after
>> > the conversion of the KDE repo to git?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Friedrich
>>
>> I'm cool with this move. I don't know what the timelines are for
>> moving kdesdk to Git, since I don't believe anybody has worked on the
>> rules for it. My current thought is that this should wait until after
>> the Git migration - subject to change based on the anticipated
>> timelines, of course. :)
>> --
>> Matt
>
> It is not possible to do it after the move to git.
>
> --
> Tom Albers
> KDE Sysadmin

Really? Ok.

Friedrich, better get the move in now then.
--
Matt