On 05/28/2010 11:28 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2010-05-28, Sebastian Trüg <trueg@kde.org> wrote:
>> The workaround I propose here which we already use in libnepomuk may not
>> handle all cases (I dont know) but it makes the whole system a lot
>> stabler. Disabling the workaround in libnepomuk makes it crash all the
>> time. With the workaround I did not have one crash.
> 
> Can't one make the nepoumk thingsn use threading a bit less
> aggressively? wouldn't that fix things?

that is not really possible without extensive changes to the whole
system including Soprano, including rewrites of big parts of the code.

Cheers,
Sebastian