On 2010-05-28, Sebastian Trüg <trueg@kde.org> wrote:
> The workaround I propose here which we already use in libnepomuk may not
> handle all cases (I dont know) but it makes the whole system a lot
> stabler. Disabling the workaround in libnepomuk makes it crash all the
> time. With the workaround I did not have one crash.

Can't one make the nepoumk thingsn use threading a bit less
aggressively? wouldn't that fix things?

/Sune