From kde-core-devel  Sun Feb 21 18:43:37 2010
From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde () carewolf ! com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:43:37 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Rekonq default
Message-Id: <201002211943.37362.kde () carewolf ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=126677784913328

On Sunday 21 February 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> konq profiles are nowhere near powerful enough for this in their current
> state. they are very useful (i've set up a few custom ones for my own usage
> in the past) but it would need a lot of additional work to make it
> possible to achieve the same kind of results that rekonq is delivering.
> 
> konq is much more flexible than rekonq because of profiles, and it really
> highlights the difference in design concept between the two apps: konq is a
> power tool that sacrifices usability for flexibility and integration
> capabilities, rekonq is trying to do one thing and do it well.
> 
I have problems seeing the necessity of the trade-off. Konqueror is not simply 
a powertool, it is just powerful. If the profiles are not powerful enough we 
need to make them more powerful, so they can provide the user with a simpler 
and cleaner experience. 


`Allan