--nextPart1632884.CeUoHaRxCo
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday 16 November 2009 05:22:09 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> But disabling MALLOC_CHECK_ on KDE makes little sense as KDE has almost no
> way to find out if the system is affected or not - openSUSE's glibc 2.10 =
is
> not. Perhaps you can apply openSUSE's patch to your glibc?

Well we can add another special case for glibc 2.10 in startkde but wouldn'=
t=20
it be better if a fix for glibc is available to get that patch upstream?

Oh wait, checking the great Google reveals a possibility of what you're=20
referring to: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D10282 (glibc=
 bug=20
10282 reported about breakage in OpenSUSE Factory?)

The testcase on that bug works great, so I'll see about trying the patch.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

--nextPart1632884.CeUoHaRxCo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAABCAAGBQJLAdHCAAoJEAuvDJx7auny0OIP/2eRxc3RGMmljNRjgykupl0k
gWpduTHzW/LgjFpohaNCHk0f0M4fFlvy9efWgtpXadHIiW4Lrm51jtiizmEcT0Rv
VCxW+F7nXZeJctMZ+M/EYWtZ3y4545Eg3rj9Lhyp2thxPxlGDQFtK8UsCJvzT0du
grQkTRaIPLY1ljFxAhQNj4C2u2lglKvc5Fx2B46otbJC4st/af+AYVCwdZ/mPmGO
AqW4stXXmWGExFFa+aljpQZuisWGi89oV+zbQYzSi0w50vBWXqzTNnxqC82VyIWg
+Ew0U3F+nxofY1S0Ika6z5B7fLma2FoPV9eYKwsQl5Mdz3VBkfG3s1pt/lk4m5CJ
O8fOvFpxHhfCFDgdqzCXUEVhvDL1KKe2xEY4bKIbUFlZAscM9ZAcYpcVXqSxz2oW
IC7jCnSnawCnSC1Rfr1ku2iu4J5mmHtNRBRHqgPddURnNdUXrp/XZQ4X7UnNnf4i
j9+UucCk3ZyGd0woFNLghwztm8aIyGIYk1pseNtHK8Bo3N43Uw7Q4yjF33pzchQy
Trg9unAKChlWumIOzDX0S0sitjuS50IjMstXYPzrwSbZ2zb/YeMMFeZ9tIWKXwme
7FfVzCQWa/T2PRDwPQ+32RfbAfQDkDXRL6B0v/0N06nhwAVVK/Mq45ZI9VaL0TVh
UTs6a6nDNEKcAe49wmvQ
=1ktB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1632884.CeUoHaRxCo--