On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Albert = Astals Cid <aacid@kde= .org> wrote:

A Diumenge, 25 d'octubre de 2009, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:

> A Diumenge, 25 d'octubre de 2009= , Urs Wolfer va escriure:
> > On Sunday 25 October 2009 20:31:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > A Diumenge, 25 d'octubre de 2009, Urs Wolfer va escriure= :
> > > > I have just moved the kdewebkit lib from
> > > > =A0playground/libs/webkitkde/kdewebkit into kdereview. = It's the KDE
> > > > =A0integration part of QtWebKit which is used directly = in many apps and
> > > > libs already (...which does *not* include the WebKit KP= art). Any KDE
> > > > app is supposed to move to this integration lib when it= is in kdelibs
> > > > (plans are to move it to kdelibs/kdewebkit).
> > > >
> > > > It requires an up-to-date kdelibs because of recent cha= nges in KIO.
> > > >
> > > > There is still a copy of it in playground/libs/webkitkd= e/kdewebkit in
> > > > order to allow building the WebKit KPart without kderev= iew. Please do
> > > > not work anymore with this copy, but use the kdereview = copy! I will
> > > > drop the playground copy as soon as has been moved to k= delibs.
> > >
> > > What's the use case of this?
> >
> > Many distributions create packages for the WebKit KPart. That'= ;s why I do
> > =A0not want to depenend on kdelibs trunk and kdereview parts. It = would only
> > =A0introduce additional complexity.
>
> That's not what i asked, what i asked is why this code should go t= o
> =A0kdelibs, what does it give over the technologies we already have th= ere?

Ok, let me say it in different words for it to be clear since s= ome people do
not want to understand.

kdelibs has KHTML, we don't need webkit at all.

Yes it has and? I mean if we have something that works better = why not pushing it?

That is your point of view, le= t's wait others.

=A0

The problem is that Nokians agenda is kill KHTML in favor of QtWebkit.
<= /blockquote>

lol, what gives you this impression? Where = have you read this? I think you have to stop to be paranoiac (Nokia don'= ;t control and don't want to control KDE).

I would rather say that many KDE people are pushing for= Webkit, like the Silk project (No relation at all with Nokia).
<= br>
Have you been to this discussion in Gran Canaria where Konque= ror/KHTML people were talking about Webkit? There was trolls in that group = just to answer questions and help them with Webkit not to say : "switc= h to webkit".

=A0

I only want to remind you the fiasco (Can't print in okular. can't = do poster
printing. why i can't print only odd pages?) of the killing of KDEPrint= by
forcing QPrinter on us that never got fixed and we are still suffering the<= br> consequences by asking us to rewrite what we already had working.
=A0
This is completely different. It's unfortunate bu= t if Nokia don't fix fast enough or don't bring features fast enoug= h, they have an open repository where you can add what you would have done = in KDEPrint.

Albert

>
> Albert
>
> > Bye
> > urs
>