[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Nepomuk as hard dependency in future?
From: Tom Albers <toma () kde ! org>
Date: 2009-10-17 14:53:51
Message-ID: 6495319.hW2sDjtrJK () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Op Saturday 17 October 2009 16:30 schreef u:
> On Saturday 17 October 2009 6:19:58 am Peter Penz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently Nepomuk is an optional dependency.
>
> I asked the same question about Soprano a couple months ago.
>
> The summary of that thread was basically: not until virtuoso is ready.
> Quoting Richard Dale "Until we have a reliable version of OpenLink Virtuoso
> that has
> its packaging and SPARQL problems fixed, I don't think we should make Soprano
> a hard dependency."
>
> We cannot make nepomuk in kdelibs a hard dependency until we also make Soprano
> a hard dependency.
Since kdepim is a depnding on nepomuk and rumors are that Virtuoso starts to get \
ready or is already ready for prime time, I think it makes sense to depend on it in \
kdebase too.. But I'm a bit biased ;-)
Toma
--
KDE Developer
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic