From kde-core-devel Fri Sep 25 15:33:59 2009 From: Mehrdad Momeny Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:33:59 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: Blogilo Moved into kdereview Message-Id: <200909251852.02658.mehrdad.momeny () gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=125389218005554 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1922281.bt1ZNLq1c2" --nextPart1922281.bt1ZNLq1c2 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 25 September 2009 04:30:44 pm Allen Winter wrote: > On Friday 25 September 2009 3:38:52 am Mehrdad Momeny wrote: > > > > We prefer to import it into KDE PIM section! because it depends on > > > > KBlog that is a part of kdepimlibs. > > > > > > Or maybe extragear/pim (As Stefan notes, kdepimlibs can be required > > > outside of kdepim as well. That's in fact the whole point of the > > > module. Allen can probably be more specific on where the best place f= or > > > blogilo is. > > > > Yes, You two are right. My reason is not a good point :D > > BTW, Because there was a plan for PIM to have a blog client, and KBlogg= er > > development is frozen now, This could be a good replacement for it :) >=20 > I'm happy to have bloglio in kdepim. > Especially since KOrganizer journal facility can post to blogs, it would = be > good to unify all the blogging capabilities into kdepim. >=20 > The kdepim vs. extragear/pim decision is up to Mehrdad. > It really depends on if Mehrdad wants to release with the normal KDE cycle > or if he wants to release on his own. Either way is fine. >=20 > -Allen >=20 The KDE 6 months release cycle is good to us! And we think KDEPIM would be better place for it! >You also have 19 issues reported by i18ncheckarg about ambigious messages >that you should fix to help out the translators. Oh, I didn't see them before, And fixed all of them right now :) Regards, Mehrdad --nextPart1922281.bt1ZNLq1c2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkq84BcACgkQQ7gIwN/Vx01eUwCeLlaIHMVk63tRMO449D6U7sIT i+YAnR5w7LK/C/vQm72n+FeuaJrLdR3Q =bykd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1922281.bt1ZNLq1c2--