From kde-core-devel  Wed Sep 02 12:56:52 2009
From: Parker Coates <parker.coates () gmail ! com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:56:52 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Detecting notification popup server capabilities
Message-Id: <85d347350909020556l222fd339p803874d559564da0 () mail ! gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=125189631817412

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 04:06, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On September 1, 2009, Kåre Särs wrote:
>> For me, the most elegant solution would be to have the cancel action in the
>> power-management plasmoid (assuming it is running) and not in the
>> notification it self.
>
> the challenge with putting it in the plasmoid is that there's a lot of other
> content in there. it's contextually correct, but could easily get lost.
>
>> My point being that the "critical" actions probably should not be in the
>> notifications.
>
> or maybe critical notifications with actions should be more pronounced...

Does the spec support giving notifications "priorities"? If so it
might make sense to show "critical" notifications, say, 60%  bigger
and in the centre of the screen.

Of course, when you implement a system like this there's always the
worry that app developers will abuse this power and spam us with lots
of "critical" notifications.

+------------------------+
| Critical Notification: |
+------------------------+
|                        |
| You made a typo!!!     |
|                        |
| +--------+  +--------+ |
| | Fix it |  | Ignore | |
| +--------+  +--------+ |
+------------------------+

:D

Parker