From kde-core-devel  Wed Sep 02 08:06:17 2009
From: "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:06:17 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Detecting notification popup server capabilities
Message-Id: <200909020206.18287.aseigo () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=125187884318995
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2761408.Oo4WDoTgDC"

--nextPart2761408.Oo4WDoTgDC
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On September 1, 2009, K=C3=A5re S=C3=A4rs wrote:
> For me, the most elegant solution would be to have the cancel action in t=
he
> power-management plasmoid (assuming it is running) and not in the
> notification it self.

the challenge with putting it in the plasmoid is that there's a lot of othe=
r=20
content in there. it's contextually correct, but could easily get lost.

> My point being that the "critical" actions probably should not be in the
> notifications.

or maybe critical notifications with actions should be more pronounced...

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Framework

--nextPart2761408.Oo4WDoTgDC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkqeJ3oACgkQ1rcusafx20P+MACdGK3O/sZgysF1h0tiKEUTyhcD
5iIAn1jVLlc7VB0tYP5BRUhvuNObbVhV
=ncQu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2761408.Oo4WDoTgDC--