--nextPart1597923.uR73DpUeN5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Op Sunday 30 August 2009 23:52 schreef u: > On 2009-08-30, Tom Albers wrote: > > > > --nextPart1340692.cVO7daI8xN > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit > > > > Op Sunday 30 August 2009 23:27 schreef u: > >> On 8/30/09, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> > A Diumenge, 30 d'agost de 2009, Tom Albers va escriure: > >> >> Op Sunday 30 August 2009 15:15 schreef u: > >> >> > Qt 4.6 will be released end of this year [...]. So should we based the > >> >> > trunk on top of 4.6 for KDE 4.4? > >> >> > >> >> My humble opinion is that if Qt 4.6 is released before KDE 4.4 Beta 1, we > >> >> can depend on it. If not released before November 11th, we can not test it > >> >> properly and can not depend on it. > >> > > >> > I'm with Tom here, don't depend on something you can not test, that's rule > >> > number one of the software development, and 4.6 does not exist so we can't > >> > test it. > >> > >> problem is that distributions will ship KDE4.4 with Qt 4.6 anyways, so > >> any problem that can be it will be there anyways, not depending on 4.6 > >> just denies features > > > > I'm sure we can make a cmake check which will give a big fat warning to > distro's to not do that. > > Which distros will ignore. Qt is not only used by KDE, and Qt is > expected to keep compability and no behaviour changes. > > /Sune Thanks. Just gave a whole new look on Debian. I naively thought they would take KDE serious and would not ignore such a warning. So, that means we can only reach one conclusion: this discussion is void, depend on qt4.6, there is no other option. Toma -- KDE Developer --nextPart1597923.uR73DpUeN5--