From kde-core-devel Sun Aug 30 21:54:37 2009 From: Ben Boeckel Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:54:37 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: KDE Trunk based on Qt 4.6 Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=125166936307651 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Albers wrote: > Op Sunday 30 August 2009 23:27 schreef u: >> On 8/30/09, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > A Diumenge, 30 d'agost de 2009, Tom Albers va escriure: >> >> Op Sunday 30 August 2009 15:15 schreef u: >> >> > Qt 4.6 will be released end of this year [...]. So should we based the >> >> > trunk on top of 4.6 for KDE 4.4? >> >> >> >> My humble opinion is that if Qt 4.6 is released before KDE 4.4 Beta 1, we >> >> can depend on it. If not released before November 11th, we can not test it >> >> properly and can not depend on it. >> > >> > I'm with Tom here, don't depend on something you can not test, that's rule >> > number one of the software development, and 4.6 does not exist so we can't >> > test it. >> >> problem is that distributions will ship KDE4.4 with Qt 4.6 anyways, so >> any problem that can be it will be there anyways, not depending on 4.6 >> just denies features > > I'm sure we can make a cmake check which will give a big fat warning to distro's to not do that. > > Toma So stop shipping Qt updates just because KDE 4.4 can't handle 4.6? Sorry, but KDE should not hold up Qt updates. Don't make it a hard dependency since it's not out yet, but don't ignore it either. Qt is backwards compatible in theory, so differences should be minor. If upstream does this, I'm sure there will be patches to work with 4.6 from Fedora at least if there are issues. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqa9R0ACgkQiPi+MRHG3qS33gCghOnsdlCzAwT3PHtGv9di16Dj yFMAmQFt43zZ0rcGDbtkPRE+B7Q3bmf2 =TAwv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----