On Friday 17 July 2009 5:44:37 pm Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Vendredi, le 17 juillet 2009, à 23:38, Matthew Woehlke a écrit:
> > - Will it require kdelibs, or remain qt-only? (Maybe part of it will
> > live in kdesupport and be qt-only, and part will live in kdelibs?) Do
> > you want it to be usable by qt-only applications?
> 
> IMHO this is another case where the reasons for the rough split of the base 
> libraries in kdesupport, kdelibs and kdepimlibs are put in question. We might 
> need a new approach. I.e. I think we need one.
> 
I'm not following.
Why?

Suggestions?