[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Qt 4.6
From:       David Johnson <david () usermode ! org>
Date:       2009-06-10 19:59:05
Message-ID: 200906101259.05240.david () usermode ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 10 June 2009 11:49:49 am Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a valid reason to define Bool in a C++ program? Normally it is a
> big WTF. This sounds like an artifact for very old compilers. Maybe it is
> possible to fix Qt to not depend on Bool?

"Bool" is being used in an enumeration of metatypes, along with "Void", 
"Double", etc. This is a perfectly appropriate use, imho. The problem is with 
X11 and C, and demonstrates the problems of #define.

-- 
David Johnson
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]