--nextPart1257499.1OQqXcNzPn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_N2YoJVFFU2uHm2v" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Boundary-01=_N2YoJVFFU2uHm2v Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject says it all. Nothing's set in stone until we release ;) so if you= =20 have comments/suggestions for improvement/etc. please let me know. The dia= log=20 is a bit different now than what I started on, hopefully this final version= is=20 enough to avoid "click-through": http://purinchu.net/dumping-ground/krun4.p= ng =20 I received some much appreciated feedback from seele (although any usabilit= y=20 errors are of course my own). Alexander Larsson is handling the same thing for GNOME, and they have chang= ed=20 their file view to only "sniff" for desktop files that are executable or in= =20 the system directory, and only files with a .desktop extension.=20 (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009- =46ebruary/msg00132.html) I think it'd be a good idea to continue further on and match that UI handli= ng. =20 Is there any reason we shouldn't? Regards, - Michael Pyne --Boundary-01=_N2YoJVFFU2uHm2v Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject says it all. Nothing's set in stone until we release ;) so if you have comments/suggestions for improvement/etc. please let me know. The dialog is a bit different now than what I started on, hopefully this final version is enough to avoid "click-through": http://purinchu.net/dumping-ground/krun4.png I received some much appreciated feedback from seele (although any usability errors are of course my own).


Alexander Larsson is handling the same thing for GNOME, and they have changed their file view to only "sniff" for desktop files that are executable or in the system directory, and only files with a .desktop extension. (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-February/msg00132.html)


I think it'd be a good idea to continue further on and match that UI handling. Is there any reason we shouldn't?


Regards,
- Michael Pyne

--Boundary-01=_N2YoJVFFU2uHm2v-- --nextPart1257499.1OQqXcNzPn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmhjY0ACgkQqjQYp5Omm0qe6wCgyG4et4x9e6KqEBZ715z30fsc 06MAoJvAuYcs8mYIGG7vTlSFib93ApJf =r1dO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1257499.1OQqXcNzPn--