From kde-core-devel Mon Feb 16 20:37:31 2009 From: Thiago Macieira Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:37:31 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: FirewallBuddy Message-Id: <200902162137.31719.thiago () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=123481671131514 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1578304.d02mxUN5zU" --nextPart1578304.d02mxUN5zU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >specifically regarding the API proposal, i don't like the idea at all. >it should go into the direction of something upnp-encompassing and >policykit-integrated. there was some talk on xdg-list in the past, i >think. I agree with that. If necessary, changes should be done in the socket=20 classes themselves (i.e., inside Qt). If there's a restrictive firewall,=20 then most sockets won't work anyways. =2D-=20 Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 --nextPart1578304.d02mxUN5zU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJmc6LM/XwBW70U1gRAu1OAKC+82xU+xwpLKzRbrJKth7BQxO27ACgilGR 5cIa5XtP+vPWLeziJX50NXg= =bwGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1578304.d02mxUN5zU--