On Saturday 27 December 2008 23:18:40 Erlend Hamberg wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:10, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > This is a very peculiar idiom for me, since it does some extra futzing on > > a 0 > > in trying to create a null pointer; but it occurs twice, so there might > > be some secret hidden meaning to it. This patch replaces static_cast by > > the null > > Ptr constructor. > > I'll have a look at this next week. It does look a bit weird, and I can't > remember why it was done that way. OK. I'll prod you from CampKDE otherwise. [ade]