On Monday 7 July 2008 14:01, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  I was afraid the mail would be too long to understand, and I see I was
> right.
> So, again in a shorter version, the two main aspects I don't like are:
> - the fact that we got this "policy" in a way which reminds me of the past
> regime in this country - it was done for the people and for their good on
> their behalf, it was posted for comments but the only allowed comment was
> "I approve", it was the only option, the feedback was ignored and the
policy was
> simply put up on techbase afterwards and with modifications even though
> that wasn't originally allowed, and now history is changing with everybody
> pretending like none of that happened and everything was right.
> - some tendencies to be pedantic about every single detail of the policy.

This is also my recollection of how the policy came into being.

-- 
David Jarvie.
KAlarm author & maintainer.
http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm