From kde-core-devel  Tue Jul 01 23:14:20 2008
From: Sebastian =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCgler?= <sebas () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:14:20 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: khtmlimage default for images instead of gwenview kpart?
Message-Id: <200807020114.24259.sebas () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=121495412208247
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2910544.66LNaPzE3M"

--nextPart2910544.66LNaPzE3M
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 00:36:32 Daniel Winter wrote:
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D161443
[...]
> A possible "fix" would be to make khtmlimage the default embedded viewer
> for images. But I do not know the cons of that. Can gvpart do things that
> are not possible with khtmlimage?
>
> What do you think?

The bug should be fixed rather than hidden.

Putting another component in will cause other regressions. IMO we shouldn't=
 do=20
this. If distros want to, that's fine. But we should make sure this kind of=
=20
things doesn't make it into the release.
=2D-=20
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9=20


--nextPart2910544.66LNaPzE3M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUASGq6UGdNh9WRGQ75AQJchQf+J/krMk11JBxr508Kq0s3/HK5skbZxrJO
VtWMJCP2y93ot7D6juzOEV5cOXyFR6Z4ts5FkMNn+KXDasTGOQOwpzWy48myZcjJ
J29QMEIi7GyG/NZ8eUkEl5iqmhIPRilSEGBDxyCsieAiUqKi7GxUufsspAYJsLY7
0Adtc3EQMcUu6y+gvo7uxVfXRbIY57tXwumbT0oaaEQLjhwHyOfPkmVGIamjGK2H
DJTE3nAj2lvmHjplVrYIfAIYuiOzbqhPdpv2GeoJ0stNSDjyFQZJq0lyMaLz7BhE
u4D/3NIY/Wic3RZj03810T5pe0tZt5fi5gl6mtwn5N1GnLdZjSRDZg==
=oSDy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2910544.66LNaPzE3M--