From kde-core-devel  Thu Jun 12 11:05:44 2008
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:05:44 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: kwallet and QCA
Message-Id: <200806121305.57152.thiago () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=121326879924242
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart6189814.gLcieBrUZm"

--nextPart6189814.gLcieBrUZm
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 12 June 2008 11:50:15 nf2 wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 June 2008, nf2 wrote:
> >> I think the crunchpoint are those "object models" - which are similar
> >
> > yes. perhaps we can draw the best from both (ACL ideas from
> > libgnome-keyring, data flexibility from kwallet) and come up with
> > something that is better than either alone and move towards that as
> > something that could be used across projects[1]; sort of like what d-bus
> > attempted with IPC.
>
> I think i have read similar statements on xdg several times (DVFS...).
> Unfortunately this "let's start from scratch and create something
> better" approach never worked out. So i'd rather not consider it as an
> option.

Agreed. Let's standardise on KWallet then? :-)

=2D-=20
=A0 Thiago Macieira =A0- =A0thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
=A0 =A0 PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
=A0 =A0 E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C =A0966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

--nextPart6189814.gLcieBrUZm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIUQMIM/XwBW70U1gRAljFAJ4iWrd1cxS7aZlZoDJWTnfwGBrxYQCgoN0i
pKLLPYflRKwfya4H9Ze40bQ=
=j1g4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart6189814.gLcieBrUZm--