From kde-core-devel Tue May 13 22:16:03 2008 From: Michael Pyne Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:16:03 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: JuK feature/bugfix; thoughts? Message-Id: <200805131816.08197.mpyne () purinchu ! net> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=121071703315597 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1796557.oZ27KsHVi9" --nextPart1796557.oZ27KsHVi9 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-00=_kMhKIX5anrsH4lo" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --Boundary-00=_kMhKIX5anrsH4lo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > On Monday 12 May 2008 22:52:23 Michael Pyne wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Reason I'm asking is because we're in feature freeze now (I always pick > > the best times to come back in port :) and I don't want to simply try and > > stretch the definition of "bugfix" that far. > > > > The patch itself is relatively non-intrusive and read-only (although > > testing is always appreciated). Is this OK, or should I wait for trunk > > to be open for KDE 4.2? > > Michael, > > I don't see a problem implementing this in trunk for the 4.1 release. > I'd put this in the category of "small potatoes" :) It has been committed as of 807472. I will also update the changelog. Regards, - Michael Pyne --Boundary-00=_kMhKIX5anrsH4lo Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Allen Winter wrote:

> On Monday 12 May 2008 22:52:23 Michael Pyne wrote:

> > Hi all,

> >

> > Reason I'm asking is because we're in feature freeze now (I always pick

> > the best times to come back in port :) and I don't want to simply try and

> > stretch the definition of "bugfix" that far.

> >

> > The patch itself is relatively non-intrusive and read-only (although

> > testing is always appreciated). Is this OK, or should I wait for trunk

> > to be open for KDE 4.2?

>

> Michael,

>

> I don't see a problem implementing this in trunk for the 4.1 release.

> I'd put this in the category of "small potatoes" :)

It has been committed as of 807472. I will also update the changelog.

Regards,

- Michael Pyne

--Boundary-00=_kMhKIX5anrsH4lo-- --nextPart1796557.oZ27KsHVi9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkgqEygACgkQqjQYp5Omm0rw2ACfYrIvaLaCogErTAA8iiSaWaMW g10AoLi/fDcj2yNTf3a5SQc74J3SBZ29 =eaxM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1796557.oZ27KsHVi9--