[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: 'lightweight' QDir::isAbsolutePath replacement ?
From: Lubos Lunak <l.lunak () suse ! cz>
Date: 2008-03-08 8:43:49
Message-ID: 200803080943.50115.l.lunak () suse ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]
On Friday 07 of March 2008, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Lubos Lunak schrieb:
> > As much as I grumble about and generally hate qt-bugs@, I disagree. If
> > QDir::isAbsolutePath() path has a performance problem, fix it, send the
> > patch to TT and put it to qt-copy/patches. That's one of the reasons it's
> > there.
>
> But - now the main question - is anyone from the trolltech devs here who
> can ensure that such a patch would be accepted ?
>
> If yes, then making a related patch and sending to TT will be the best
> option.
>
> If not, a kdelibs located implementation will be the next best option,
> maybe replaced later by a qt based implementation.
No. The next best option is still patching Qt, even if TT doesn't give a damn
about the patch. That's their problem, not ours, and there's no point in
complicating our lives by adding a duplicate function in kdelibs.
Qt-copy/patches is not only for patches TT like, it's also for patches they
don't like. Why do you think Qt3-based qt-copy patches has so many so old
patches?
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak@suse.cz , l.lunak@kde.org
Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 972
190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http//www.suse.cz
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic