On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Richard Dale <rdale@foton.es> wrote:
> I don't
> think that it is a major problem that scripting languages can't instantiate
> read-only/const versions of KConfigGroup in the end.

This was my thought. I Ruby program for my day job, and I pretty much
don't assume or expect things like const-ness. It's not a feature of
Ruby. It's part of what makes programming C++ sometimes a relief.

Ian