From kde-core-devel Fri Dec 28 12:53:40 2007 From: "Jos Poortvliet" Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:53:40 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: Shipping a cursor theme with KDE Message-Id: <5c77e14b0712280453u2f708713s755328a45b6ae337 () mail ! gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=119884646206879 On 12/28/07 and before, Torsten Rahn and some others wrote: > BLABLABLA Let's go back to basic. Why do we have a feature freeze? To ensure stability. It would be kind'a silly to forget about that, right? Now we have two big questions (and if ANY subquestion here below would be answered as 'no', the artwork should go in). The first is rather about the 'process', the other one is more 'content'. Big question ONE: Are these cursors subject to the freeze? => is artwork as a whole was subject to the freeze? If yes, then: => are these cursors something entirely different then the cursors, on which work is still going on?If yes, then: Big question TWO: Do cursors threathen the stability of KDE 4.0 if included? => could they, technically, break stuff for the user? If yes, then: => is it impossible or every hard to test them to ensure this won't happen? If any question can be answered with NO, the cursors should go in as default. If all answers are yes, they could imho still go in but not as default. grtz Jos