From kde-core-devel  Wed Nov 21 15:15:56 2007
From: Alex Merry <huntedhacker () tiscali ! co ! uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:15:56 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: kwin default window button order.
Message-Id: <200711211515.57093.huntedhacker () tiscali ! co ! uk>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=119565832717734
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart4451951.afosZEzZVK"

--nextPart4451951.afosZEzZVK
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 21 Nov 2007, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  No, nothing has happened yet, besides Aaron committing the patch
> without changing the defaults. Right now it's waiting on me to make
> up my mind, read what others have said (your "lots" is 4, BTW, if I'm
> counting right, with 2 people saying close on the right and 2 close
> on the left) and select the new layout if any (and hey, I had a
> weekend).

I've had
max min [extra space] sticky winmenu title................ close
for a while now.  It requires a little thinking to remember to go to the=20
left for maximise and minimise, so I definitely think close should stay=20
right (given that it's used a lot more frequently).

I agree that there needs to be more space between close and the other=20
buttons.  As yet, I'm undecided as to whether having close on its own=20
and others on the left or having just lots more space on the right=20
feels better.

Alex




=2D-=20
KDE: http://www.kde.org
Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org

--nextPart4451951.afosZEzZVK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHREusBRauKLutZ9ARAhkTAKCBBEEz2vGep0v2naZugoXqpYiwmQCgzDcf
hmK+w+0ophc2IGCLFQN1+ls=
=57Zu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4451951.afosZEzZVK--