From kde-core-devel  Mon Nov 19 22:54:07 2007
From: Kevin Ottens <ervin () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:54:07 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KJob deleting itself too early?
Message-Id: <200711192354.12750.ervin () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=119551291620193
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2130745.rIHGuQToCP"

--nextPart2130745.rIHGuQToCP
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Le lundi 19 novembre 2007, David Faure a =E9crit :
> We cannot change the default behavior of KJob at this point.
> But a setAutoDelete(false) would be fine with me.
> K=E9vin is the maintainer though, he has final say.

Actually I was pretty sure we already had that... As for a separate flag li=
ke=20
setAutoDelete(), or extending the Capabilities flag I'm undecided. In any=20
case the default must be auto delete enabled IMO.

Is it too late for such an API addition? (or an enum value, or a pair of=20
methods)

Regards.
=2D-=20
K=E9vin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le ma=EEtre sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans ma=EEtre,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."

--nextPart2130745.rIHGuQToCP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHQhQUB0u7y43syeIRAtUDAJ9sXJXYjEl4E1TISyhOGdU2p8aWwgCeMesX
AwGGV++gKxd3yHknh/GEd0g=
=mIxi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2130745.rIHGuQToCP--