From kde-core-devel  Wed Oct 31 15:28:46 2007
From: Matthias Kretz <kretz () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:28:46 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: WITH_PREFIX for kdemodules?
Message-Id: <200710311628.53854.kretz () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=119384458115838
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart12319544.asvvJYnlHy"

--nextPart12319544.asvvJYnlHy
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 29 October 2007, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Is there a technical reason (e.g. some tools expect this) to use 'lib'
> prefix for kde plugins?

I was chatting with dirk about this once and he convinced me that it's a ni=
ce=20
feature to have on Linux where it's possible to use the lib as plugin and=20
shared lib at the same time. E.g. applications like konsole that provide a=
=20
KPart and a shell. To save some startup time konsole on Linux could link to=
=20
it's part instead of dlopening it.

=2D-=20
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz@gmx.net, kretz@kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

--nextPart12319544.asvvJYnlHy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHKJ81yg4WnCj6OIoRAnBLAKDk434RZcNk1N2Fcx16kDp2hkuVPgCgsJF3
pnXqspcpYbOF5swCMdNUFCg=
=uptx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart12319544.asvvJYnlHy--