--nextPart26539896.seEAVb4gvn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Em Monday 22 October 2007 14:29:25 Kurt Pfeifle escreveu: > > In any case, CUPS isn't the only backend we support. > > It is a pretty save guess that more than 90% of *nix-based users have > CUPS. No doubt about that. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that CUPS is the only= =20 printing system we should support on Unix. This is my *personal* opinion. The problem is that we're no longer Unix-only. Here's where problems arise. > This in turn means we should be very careful with what we change for > them, especially if we remove features. I understand. > And for Win32/64 of course, never existed at all up to now. Now it does. And it doesn't accept PostScript. > > Therefore, we cannot rely > > on CUPS features, like accepting those formats. > > Where there is CUPS underneath, *of course* you should rely on and offer > to use those features! What else?! Agreed, but it has to be done only where it makes sense. If we provide a "print a PNG" feature, we have to provide it everywhere (or= =20 come up with a really good and convincing reason why it doesn't work in=20 certain circumstances).=20 Which in turn means we must not depend on a CUPS feature only: it has to=20 be "emulated" in our printing system if the feature isn't available in the= =20 backend. Printing image formats is rather easy, because we have image loaders. We do= n't=20 have a PostScript loader though: so implementing a light-weight equivalent= =20 of "kprinter *.ps" is close to impossible. Enter, therefore, the heavy-weig= ht=20 all-purpose document viewer. I have no problems with providing "kprinter" in KDE Workspace: we can easil= y=20 say we support CUPS only in the KDE Workspace (see above). And this is also= =20 not a co-installability issue, because KDE Workspace 4 cannot be installed = at=20 the same time as KDE 3's. > > That is not a KDE3-vs-KDE4 co-installability issue. > > Right, But it is something to keep in mind whenever "printing" is dis- > cussed. No. You're hijacking every single thread that has "print" mentioned to=20 reiterate again and again your arguments. We have understood them. Now let's stick to the topic at hand: installing KDE 3 and 4 at the same ti= me. =2D-=20 =A0 Thiago Macieira =A0- =A0thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org =A0 =A0 PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: =A0 =A0 E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C =A0966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 --nextPart26539896.seEAVb4gvn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHHJtxM/XwBW70U1gRAmKdAJ9G0hGj65C4XLX1CEp/B5MwkSF/swCgsaHy 0IBvsjf2iM99PK9bMkXFFx4= =8HIa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart26539896.seEAVb4gvn--