--nextPart1899245.0HQZKifu9u
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 18 October 2007 13:09:19 Lubos Lunak wrote:
> =A0Nah. The "unfixable" part is the fact that with multiline lineedits
> there's no obvious minimum size (since you can stretch the width or
> height while reducing the other and the contents will still fit) and
> "can't be fixed in X11" means that the window manager spec has support
> for minimum size, but only for fixed minimum size and not any
> width-for-height size.
>
> =A0TT apparently are not willing to do anything besides a perfect fix
> (which is not possible as they say), but I think e.g. going with a
> reasonable ratio of width/height as the minimum size could work good
> enough for most cases.

Speaking as a co-KDE guy; I know you are well known in the window-manager=20
area so I'm wondering what is holding up the 'perfect fix' ?
Can you perhaps work in the spec to make this a concept available on X11?

=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart1899245.0HQZKifu9u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHF653CojCW6H2z/QRAugiAKC0AQ21ViUPd6C1Vwu8BuV2jIR3IACeIsPX
uViKIoWp+FC2hJKfqgbDQVo=
=ACiq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1899245.0HQZKifu9u--