--nextPart3458563.ucK5f8OSQE
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 31 August 2007, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:

> Is it necessary to put this into the code directly when there are already
> standalone tools that do this?  I've been using grc to do this for years
> and it does the job quite well and it even has the ability to add custom
> configuration files (conf.kdebug perhaps?).  For example, I use "grc tail
> -F /var/log/{maillog,messages,mail/info,mail,warn,acpid}&" and end up with
> a very nicely-colorized output shown here:
> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=3D1284102997&size=3Do
>
> Or am I missing something simple?

I also think that postprocessing is a better way as you often might need to=
=20
check a logfile later via an editor to see what happened, and if the logfil=
e=20
contains some ESC sequences, I don't think that it is easy to read.

=2D-=20
Best regards/Sch=F6ne Gr=FC=DFe

Martin    ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail=20
          /\                        - against microsoft attachments

--nextPart3458563.ucK5f8OSQE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBG2vBQUeHBRvgua64RApZsAJwL2JrgNP4yT5SmKv1+IxQ6n5AFpQCeJSbr
1UXgX0zfxhUP4vk/f8GTGck=
=/ZmC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3458563.ucK5f8OSQE--