From kde-core-devel Thu Aug 30 17:55:41 2007 From: "Jos Poortvliet" Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:55:41 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: clarification on git, central repositories and commit access lists Message-Id: <5c77e14b0708301055y5fa99ddegb7e8b2cfcf7c9cba () mail ! gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=118849659922553 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------=_Part_3656_21869888.1188496541789" ------=_Part_3656_21869888.1188496541789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/30/07, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:48, Josef Spillner wrote: > > On Thursday 30 August 2007 09:41:24 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > It's a temporary list and only for those who are really interested in > > > making it happen. That is, people who have already voiced their > opinions > > > on the buildsystem and are willing to get their hands dirty. > > Thiago's message makes me want to reply to all website change requests in > future with "Are you sure? " "Really sure? " "Please > provide 3 GPG-signed statements from KDE e.V. members confirming that you > want this. "; the people on the receiving end of > website > requests like "please add this mailing list" have *no* way of guessing the > intentions or the consensus reached elsewhere. It's an annoying way to > work. > > > Nevertheless I'd already requested a link to the mailman overview page > for > > people who really want an overview on all mail.kde.org lists. No > reaction > > so far. > > O yeah, I remember that. Bear in mind that webmaster@kde.org is almost but > not > quite the same thing as /dev/null -- there is no coordinated team behind > it > handling change requests. That's pretty bad (not only because I've send them some requests)... Is it THAT bad? Do we need a dot article asking for skilled webadmin ppl? -- > Adriaan de Groot > KDE Quality Team http://www.englishbreakfastnetwork.org/ > SQO-OSS Researcher http://www.sqo-oss.eu/ > ------=_Part_3656_21869888.1188496541789 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/30/07, Adriaan de Groot <groot@kde.org> wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:48, Josef Spillner wrote:
> On Thursday 30 August 2007 09:41:24 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > It's a temporary list and only for those who are really interested in
> > making it happen. That is, people who have already voiced their opinions
> > on the buildsystem and are willing to get their hands dirty.

Thiago's message makes me want to reply to all website change requests in
future with "Are you sure? <yes> <no>" "Really sure? <no> <yes>" "Please
provide 3 GPG-signed statements from KDE e.V. members confirming that you
want this. <continue> <cancel>"; the people on the receiving end of website
requests like "please add this mailing list" have *no* way of guessing the
intentions or the consensus reached elsewhere. It's an annoying way to work.

> Nevertheless I'd already requested a link to the mailman overview page for
> people who really want an overview on all mail.kde.org lists. No reaction
> so far.

O yeah, I remember that. Bear in mind that webmaster@kde.org is almost but not
quite the same thing as /dev/null -- there is no coordinated team behind it
handling change requests.

That's pretty bad (not only because I've send them some requests)... Is it THAT bad? Do we need a dot article asking for skilled webadmin ppl?

--
Adriaan de Groot
  KDE Quality Team   http://www.englishbreakfastnetwork.org/
  SQO-OSS Researcher http://www.sqo-oss.eu/

------=_Part_3656_21869888.1188496541789--