From kde-core-devel  Wed Aug 22 08:08:08 2007
From: Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:08:08 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: clarification on git, central repositories and commit access lists
Message-Id: <200708221008.08534.zander () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=118777014301052
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2569155.YJVliIquJ1"

--nextPart2569155.YJVliIquJ1
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:16:58 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> with tools like svnmerge branches are actually quite usable and there
> is relatively little difference to your "idealized git-based workflow".

There are quite a lot of people that disagree ;)

I agree that the feature checklist is similar, but so it is with Windows=20
and Linux. Yet I still have a strong preference.
Its that the tool is more finished and when you hit corner cases the svn=20
ones just fall flat on their face.  (Hands up for everyone that tried to=20
merge a patch from a branch and ended up doing a manual diff/patch).

There really is a difference.
=2D-=20
Thomas Zander

--nextPart2569155.YJVliIquJ1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGy+7oCojCW6H2z/QRAtnaAJ9nWQrKdm/PW/pU7GtcCF/6GUwFiwCfSNTC
wLXzdcBC9htvjca3Ay6XKdQ=
=12FW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2569155.YJVliIquJ1--