--nextPart5381095.MRku2WXF86
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:16:58 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:45:16AM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > As an example; in Krita we have this excellent GSoC project for color
> > mixing,
> >
> > the author programs in trunk and thus commits everything there.
>
> now, that's the fundamental problem. the rest of your argumentation
> falls flat with it.
> with tools like svnmerge branches are actually quite usable and there is
> relatively little difference to your "idealized git-based workflow".

The biggest difference is that with git (or any other SCM that can _actuall=
y_=20
merge) multiple people can have their branches and merge with each other an=
d=20
after merging "annotate" and the like still work. That is not the case with=
=20
svn and svnmerge.


Simon

--nextPart5381095.MRku2WXF86
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGy+rhWXvMThJCpvIRAsJwAKDtjT5guVtTQcZgfGnRCPe2gKyGpQCg8RuT
FKvx3C7Lj0orwEF8e2MGoso=
=StdZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5381095.MRku2WXF86--