From kde-core-devel  Thu Aug 02 00:26:44 2007
From: Clarence Dang <dang () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:26:44 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: State of kdefx
Message-Id: <200708021026.47803.dang () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=118601446219682

On Thursday 02 August 2007 06:04, Mosfet wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:51:50 am Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > Mosfet wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:06:03 am Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > >> In that case, can we integrate Blitz
> > >> into KDE's svn, or what? Replacing kdefx (i.e. put it in kdelibs for
> > >> now) would be the least hassle for others. Any thoughts on making
> > >> Blitz also static to avoid BC issues when we remove it?
> > >
> > > That's fine as long as non-SVN apps can access it.
> >
> > What do you mean by "non-SVN apps"? If we move it to kdelibs it will be
> > equally accessible as kdefx. Do you mean non-KDE apps should be able to
> > use it?
>
> No, just that the headers and stuff be installed. Static is absolutely fine
> with me, no problems.

Do you mean "static linking" of Blitz to applications?  What is it licensed 
under?