On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:21:13 Andreas Pakulat wrote:

> > It shows that the bugs introduced by the change weren't obvious. They
> > didn't break compilation, but the behavior of applications in a somewhat
> > subtle way. Which definitely is a problem since people changing the
> > libraries don't test running applications.
>
> Adam surely tested that his changes worked in kdevelop ;) But I do
> understand the problem. So as I said, as long as you make the
> read/writeConfig and set/useDefaults methods virtual so they can be
> changed completely in subclasses its fine with me reverting the changes.

For me it's not a problem to change it to virtual.
If nobody complains about it I will change it next monday.

Regards

> Andreas