On Thursday 12 April 2007, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > i also think that holding nepomuk to the same freeze schedule and
> > > standards as kdecore, kdeui, kio may be unrealistic at any point.
> > > by delaying to 4.1 my concern is that all we'll achieve is delaying
> > > it's maturity and, due to the likeliehood of low application uptake
> > > (see my reply to dirk for more on that if you wish/need it) the
> > > odds are high that the version in 4.1 wouldn't be much more proven
> > > than a version in 4.0.
> >
> > Couldn't we just release it with kdelibs as a framework marked
> > "experimental"? There may be other candidates for that status, too.
> 
> I disagree with this. People will still use it and complain after.
Too bad for them.

> I propose kdeextragear-libs
This doesn't sound like a good place for a lib that the main kde modules are going to need;
extragear is typically compiled -after- the main kde modules.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).