--nextPart1501612.8KQoiYcZfN
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Tom Albers wrote:
>Op ma 12 mar 2007 19:54 schreef u:
>> Tom Albers wrote:
>> >Please move it to /tags/unmaintained/[3|4]/ as we agreed on
>> > earlier...
>>
>> We didn't agree on that. We had a discussion that seemingly simply
>> died.
>
>Right, with no better solution then the original suggestion...

There's a difference between a mail thread dying out and there being no=20
further comments.

>> Someone has to conclude it.
>> Placing it on the techbase website does not make it official.
>
>I placed a RFC, received comments, incorporated them, mailed the final
> version, received no objections and placed it on techbase. If we can
> not make a descision based on such a process, I'm not sure we are able
> to make any at all.

Hmm... ok, then it seems I am not remembering things correctly. I don't=20
remember the final version. That might be why you didn't get no=20
objections from me either...

So, I think you did the right thing... except that:

>> I still have objections on the [3|4] part. Not to mention
>> that /tags/unmaintained does not exist and only the sysadmins can
>> create it. So, there's no policy yet.
>
>I have serious problems with this mail.

You forgot to ask sysadmins to create /tags/unmaintained. Unless they do,=20
the policy is useless since no one can uphold it.

=2D-=20
=A0 Thiago Macieira =A0- =A0thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
=A0 =A0 PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
=A0 =A0 E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C =A0966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

--nextPart1501612.8KQoiYcZfN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBF9a+sM/XwBW70U1gRAky2AKCyzp2hWktqoinkZjuoF3QVtlQZNACePXBs
vzAAyNkWLf5GVL1xCBuIdZU=
=4PkR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1501612.8KQoiYcZfN--