On 3/1/07, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Paolo Capriotti wrote: > >Yes, David, that's exactly the reason I've started with the Settings > >thing in the first place. > > You're missing the point: > > >- Avoids touching KConfig, which as you said, is used by a lot of > >existing code, so we'd better not break it. > > We're touching KConfig anyways. This is the best and only time in +/- 5 > years to do it. So, help us get KConfig right before KDE 4.0 is released. Ok, fine. I'll work on KConfig, even if I don't like its approach very much (especially the use of QVariants). It's just that I'm a bit disappointed for all the effort I've put into this Settings thing that has not been considered at all. Paolo