[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KConfig vs. QSettings (was Re: Porting problems with
From: Andreas Pakulat <apaku () gmx ! de>
Date: 2007-02-28 9:47:13
Message-ID: 20070228094713.GA3859 () morpheus ! apaku ! dnsalias ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On 27.02.07 11:26:28, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Dienstag 27 Februar 2007 schrieb Tobias Koenig:
>
> > I'd really like to see KConfig offering the same hierarchical structure
> > (groups in groups) that QSettings offers. We have so many broken code
> > that fakes it by having a 'NumGroups=x' entry with '[Group_1]' '[Group_2]'
> > groups.
> >
> > That's really something the framework should offer!
> Yeah, and it shouldn't be _too_ hard to implement - the API can offer it
> easily, in kconfiggroups having a group() - but it somehow needs to map it
> to the ini file.
Why don't we do as the Trolls? They use
subGroup\Variable=Value
to map subGroups.
Andreas
--
You will be singled out for promotion in your work.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic