From kde-core-devel Thu Feb 22 17:58:53 2007 From: David Faure Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:58:53 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: organizing kdebase Message-Id: <200702221858.54112.faure () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=117216715305373 On Thursday 22 February 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On February 22, 2007, Richard Moore wrote: > > I think the issue here is more that non-KDE applications that use > > these tools to integrate into KDE should be able to depend on them to > > be present. > > that's why they are in kdebase, and not in kdebase/apps or kdebase/workspace. > > perhaps "tools" is a better word than "utils" here then; "utils" seems to > imply "miscelaneous crud" which isn't true. nor was that my intention with > this grouping. > > keeping runtime/ to mean "those applications which form the runtime > requirements of KDE applications" seems to be a good separate goal to me for > reasons i've already stated. I don't see why we need to separate the runtime-requirements of C++ KDE applications from the runtime-requirements of KDE-related scripts. Especially since we're arguing over 6 small tools :) -- David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).